If I ask you to tell me the name of person with whom you can talk for hours, with whom you can share every single moment of your life anytime, in any situation than you will count lots of names but please concentrate on the word “ANYTIME”. Just think are you always feeling the same free and relaxed secured with the person you are talking about? Practically no. Sometimes a person feels, he is not comfortable while talking with a particular person and he avoids that person. Many times it happens that we can't talk properly with our family members, elders and younger too…
Some days back I was sitting with my friend and he was so much disturbed because of a fight with his dad…He was arguing that communication gap between my friend and his father is increasing day by day…That time I was just speechless because he was comparing communication between A son and his father. He was blaming his grandfather for the same. He was arguing that because of his grand father he and his father are upset and fighting. I reached home and got lost in thoughts…Was it a valid reason from him? Was his grand father only the reason? ”COMMUNICATION GAP” and “GENERATION GAP”…these two words are very much famous in youngsters today. Mom-dad resist me in the entire thing and it’s because of my grandfather. What he was trying to say is; His grandfather is very much narrow minded and so his father is. Generally our grand parents are having very different thinking and point of views with respect to us. It’s a common thing. Let me give you an example. Compare your self with a student who is studying in same school, same collage in which you were studying few years back. Compare your way of thinking with him and you will get the answer and reasons of such kind of variations and gaps.
He was arguing that he wants a big home a long car and his father is not interested because of his grandfather. His grand father argues in small things and because of his grandfather he is not getting things he actually wants and deserves. I was shocked when I heard this. It’s not a case of communication gap or generation gap. When I was taking tuition; several times it happened that my students were arguing and not agreeing with my points. They were having their own different thinking and views as compared to me. So it’s a case of different thinking rather than communication gap. What I think is your thinking and behavior is very much dependant on your surroundings, your friend circles. It’s very much reliable on life style you’re living.
Present is always well manufactured and well maintained than past. What you or I want in my future? Better life and better surroundings. What is the meaning of “better”. Its nothing but comparatively more matured and more flexible, more comfortable life with compare to the present life.
my friend’s wishes I think were because of his friend circle …May be his friends belong to high class family and because his father is not fulfilling his wishes he is not happy…I think he should not blame his father or grandfather for anything…We generally compare our present with someone’s present and compare our past with someone’s past…We can dream but we can’t say it’s must for you to fulfill my wishes…
Conclusion is we should live according to our culture not according to the trend…It may possible that your friend is not facing problems which you are facing but it doesn’t mean his family is better than yours…And yes a father is a bridge between grandfather and grandson…So its parent's duty to keep away their young ones from some family problems or better say misunderstandings…Because a baby will speak what he is listening…
That’s it….
Hello friends,
Every single coin has two sides with opposite meanings. You will never find similarities between two different things or same thing which belong to same category as far as world is concern. We have categorized ourselves in different categories and then I don’t understand why the hell we are blaming our societies for such things? Why we are arguing and complaining against such category?
As far as ASIA is concern most of the countries are having basic protocols of independence. A person is free and independent. He can speak, he can share, he can write, he can perform, he can show his thoughts and ideas without any kind of interruptions (On papers only). Than what is the reason of “HUMILIATION”? Do we know the exact definition of humiliation? We don’t. We have defined it for our own satisfaction.
Let me give an example of BOLLYWOOD. There are lots of issues regarding humiliations in past. In one particular movie if there is something regarding HINDU-MUSLIM than religious organizations will come in action. They will claim that director and other persons who are involved had caused them humiliation in that particular film. What is the basic purpose of entertainment? What is the basic of a film? Is there any use of such kind of documentaries? What they are trying to show? Realities? If directors or film makers will start directing movies on basis of what religious organization think, what they want them to make then there is no use of it. Motive of entertainment will disappear.
News published in DIVYA BHASKAR , “ an organization belong to some slum areas claimed that the film maker of SLUMDOG MILLIONAIRE had caused them significant humiliation, and called them dogs in the movie so they want justice. And ANIL KAPOOR and music director A R REHMAN also abused badly by them. Now their actual argue is “dog” is the word people generally use for them who are behaving like animal. And so movie maker have to say sorry and they will not allow them to release the film in India. Now if “dog” was only the reason of such kind of issue than there are lots of films in my memory, in which they have used this word so many times and broken numerous records and still people are crazy for those films. Why such organizations are partial? Where were they at that time? And now suddenly they realized and arguing. They should feel proud on REHMAN and they should thank them for first GOLDEN GLOB he secured for INDIAN film industry.
I remember few years back when FANNA was on calendar, AAMIR KHAN has given statement related to NARMADA project and FANNA is a past now and milestone for GUJARATI NEWS PAPERS. But in this care where are those basic rights Indian government has given to an Indian? He was free to say what he thinks and he is. Everyone is free to share his/her thoughts in INDIA and what was the reason? Humiliation? I don’t think so.(sorry if someone hurt by this paragraph, but I cant compromise with my thoughts as I am independent).
Scenario is, such organizations are blaming and shouting when someone is use a word like “DOG”, “DONKEY”, “MONKEY” for them, just imagine what will be the scenario when animals will start arguing on such issues? Yes but I am sure; their arguments will be more legal and acceptable than us-“THINKERS”.
That’s it.
Every single coin has two sides with opposite meanings. You will never find similarities between two different things or same thing which belong to same category as far as world is concern. We have categorized ourselves in different categories and then I don’t understand why the hell we are blaming our societies for such things? Why we are arguing and complaining against such category?
As far as ASIA is concern most of the countries are having basic protocols of independence. A person is free and independent. He can speak, he can share, he can write, he can perform, he can show his thoughts and ideas without any kind of interruptions (On papers only). Than what is the reason of “HUMILIATION”? Do we know the exact definition of humiliation? We don’t. We have defined it for our own satisfaction.
Let me give an example of BOLLYWOOD. There are lots of issues regarding humiliations in past. In one particular movie if there is something regarding HINDU-MUSLIM than religious organizations will come in action. They will claim that director and other persons who are involved had caused them humiliation in that particular film. What is the basic purpose of entertainment? What is the basic of a film? Is there any use of such kind of documentaries? What they are trying to show? Realities? If directors or film makers will start directing movies on basis of what religious organization think, what they want them to make then there is no use of it. Motive of entertainment will disappear.
News published in DIVYA BHASKAR , “ an organization belong to some slum areas claimed that the film maker of SLUMDOG MILLIONAIRE had caused them significant humiliation, and called them dogs in the movie so they want justice. And ANIL KAPOOR and music director A R REHMAN also abused badly by them. Now their actual argue is “dog” is the word people generally use for them who are behaving like animal. And so movie maker have to say sorry and they will not allow them to release the film in India. Now if “dog” was only the reason of such kind of issue than there are lots of films in my memory, in which they have used this word so many times and broken numerous records and still people are crazy for those films. Why such organizations are partial? Where were they at that time? And now suddenly they realized and arguing. They should feel proud on REHMAN and they should thank them for first GOLDEN GLOB he secured for INDIAN film industry.
I remember few years back when FANNA was on calendar, AAMIR KHAN has given statement related to NARMADA project and FANNA is a past now and milestone for GUJARATI NEWS PAPERS. But in this care where are those basic rights Indian government has given to an Indian? He was free to say what he thinks and he is. Everyone is free to share his/her thoughts in INDIA and what was the reason? Humiliation? I don’t think so.(sorry if someone hurt by this paragraph, but I cant compromise with my thoughts as I am independent).
Scenario is, such organizations are blaming and shouting when someone is use a word like “DOG”, “DONKEY”, “MONKEY” for them, just imagine what will be the scenario when animals will start arguing on such issues? Yes but I am sure; their arguments will be more legal and acceptable than us-“THINKERS”.
That’s it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
